Prospective Buyers Are Beginning to Walk Away from Home Purchases

September 4, 2013 3 Comments »
Prospective Buyers Are Beginning to Walk Away from Home Purchases

Over the past few years, the term “walking away” was synonymous with strategic default. In short, homeowners who were underwater on their mortgages had very little hope of turning things around.

As a result, they would simply walk away from the property (and the mortgage), accepting whatever consequences came with that. Typically, a big fat credit hit and the need to find a new place to dwell.

Interestingly, some of these same borrowers now qualify for mortgages again because so many years have passed since that phenomenon began.

And those able to prove extenuating circumstances, such as a temporary job loss that led to a short sale or foreclosure (or even bankruptcy) can now get an FHA loan just one year later.

So despite many calling the mortgage market too conservative, there are ample opportunities for those with checkered pasts to obtain financing.

The New Walk Away Is an Affordability Thing

I cautioned a while back that affordability was set to fall off a cliff, given the dramatic rise in mortgage rates, coupled with higher asking prices.

And now it’s causing would-be home buyers to walk away from deals. A new Bloomberg report cites several examples where prospective buyers are backing out because of affordability concerns.

One couple in Seattle thought they could afford a $400,000 home because that’s what the math told them back in February when their home search began.

Today, their housing payment is roughly $300 higher than it would have been had they closed before rates surged. As a result, they’re looking at a smaller home instead.

Another family in Portland tried to back out of a home purchase because rates have both increased their proposed housing payment and made it more difficult to sell their existing home. Talk about a double whammy.

This is apparently a trend, according to a Redfin economist cited in the article, who said a lot of agents are dealing with buyers who were in escrow that can no longer afford to buy. All the more reason to make sure your buyer is qualified, even if rates go up.

One Redfin agent said his client is waiting to buy in fall once competition dies down, though there’s the risk that interest rates could be even higher then. And prices.

[First Sign of Mortgage Rate Impact as New Home Sales Disappoint]

Just How Bad Are the Higher Mortgage Rates?

You’d think that a couple hundred dollars wouldn’t derail someone’s ability to qualify for a loan, but apparently it does.

When it comes down to it, DTI ratios limit how much a prospective homeowner can afford, so those on the cusp can easily run into trouble if they don’t lock their rate at the outset when they may have been originally pre-approved.

I created some mortgage payment charts to quickly eyeball interest rate changes and their impact on monthly payments.

For smaller loan amounts, the difference in payment is still pretty minimal. On a $200,000 loan amount, the monthly mortgage payment on a 30-year fixed at 4.5% versus 3.5% is only about $115 more.

On a $500,000 loan, the difference jumps to nearly $300, which is a bit more devastating to the old wallet.

This probably explains why homeowners are either looking for smaller and/or cheaper homes, or considering the use of hybrid ARMs, such as the 5/1 or 10/1 to keep payments at bay.

3 Comments

  1. Allen Sanford September 4, 2013 at 3:31 pm -

    The IRS, Justice Department and the Treasury Department, by way of the former Office of Thrift Supervision, have allowed the people who own Mortgage Electronics Registration Systems Inc(MERS) to “cherry pick” the properties while the interest rates were low after allowing them to keep $35 trillion in offshore accounts, according to Congressional records. Cash transactions were used to out bid those who thought that they could get financed. The people who own MERS also own the banks. The banks have kept these properties in a “shadow inventory”.
    A “Whistle-blower” complaint has been sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission o the matter. Henry Paulson’s hedge fund made $1 billion betting against sub-prime mortgages while he was the Secretary of The Treasury. During the same period he was the Chief Negotiator for Lehman Brothers as they went through bankruptcy. He orchestrated a partnership between Lehman, HSBC, Deutsche, and GMAC to liquidate the sub-prime mortgages that were left on Lehman’s books. This partnership also allowed Deutsche, the largest bank in Germany and HSBC, the largest bank in the UK, entry into the sub-prime mortgage market.
    As Secretary of the Treasury Paulson prevented the OTS from responding to complaints of fraud to protect the bet that his hedge fund had made. The petition is online titled “Real Estate Crisis or Government Sanctioned Racketeering?” The petition has close to 1,000 likes. It has been sent to the City of Richmond, who is considering filing eminent domain proceedings against the banks, and to the Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC) in a “Whistle-blower” complaint.

  2. Jamiel September 5, 2013 at 1:08 am -

    The statement and previous article about “qualification” for an FHA loan 1 year after foreclosure is not completely accurate. True, the FHA has issued a directive they will insure a loan 1 year after foreclosure; but the FHA doesn’t issue loans. The lenders have internal standards same as a higher FICO requirement than FHA. Just as I’m unaware of any lender offering loans a the FHA FICO standard, I’m unaware of any lender offering a loan 1 year after foreclosure. If there are different experiences I would like to hear about them.

  3. Colin Robertson September 5, 2013 at 6:59 am -

    I suppose like any guideline, it is subject to overlays, so we’ll see if anyone actually offers it. Good point.

Leave A Response